Tag Archives: #Pandemic

Webinar on the Topic “Making India a Hub of Arbitration”| JUS CORPUS

ABOUT JUS CORPUS 

ISSN (O): 2582-7820; Indexed at 25 Databases.

Jus Corpus is a double-blind peer-reviewed Interdisciplinary E-Journal that provides a platform to students, academicians, scholars, professors & professionals in the fields of law and management to publish their Articles, Blogs, Case Comments, Research Papers, etc. in the different volumes and Blog section.

Jus Corpus aims to bring various aspects and chains of Law under a single umbrella and provide services to the Law students. The inspiration was derived from the ever-growing need of the Law Students. We offer Online Internship opportunities to Law Students as Law Researchers, Content Writers, and Editors, etc.

ABOUT THE SPEAKERS

1. Mr. Jeevan Ballav Panda (Partner, Khaitan & Co.)

He is a disputes lawyer with more than 13 years’ experience having a special focus on Commercial Litigation, Arbitration and Employment. He is also empanelled as an Arbitrator at the Delhi International Arbitration Centre (DIAC). He was featured in Asian Legal Business (ALB) India’s Super 50 Lawyers 2020 based on recommendation of clients and external counsel and senior counsel sent directly to ALB. The Legal 500 (Legalease) 2021 Asia Pacific has recognised him as a Recommended Lawyer for Labour and Employment. Recently, he have also been recognised by ALB as one of India’s 50 Rising Stars in ALB’s India Rising Stars Ranking 2021.

2. Mr. Rishav Dutt (Principal Associate, Khaitan & Co.)

He manages legal services in practice areas such as commercial litigation, arbitration and employment and labour benefit practice for the Kolkata office of the Firm. He is a Principal Associate. With more than 10 years of professional experience, he has core competence in the areas of commercial litigation, arbitration (Domestic and International). He has advised several clients, both in the public and private sector, on general commercial litigation including strategy and conflict advisory in potential dispute situations. He has handled commercial litigations before a number of High Courts in India and has consistent experience of handling complex matters. He also conducts trials in various domestic arbitrations.

ABOUT THE SESSION

The topic of the Webinar: “Making India a Hub of Arbitration”

Date: August 28, 2021

Timing: 6:00 pm (onwards)

Venue: YouTube Live

Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCiupb-xxBUNetwODl5dJVDg 

Registration Link: https://forms.gle/2KchfHvgH59QemxP6 

PERKS: E-Certificates to all the Attendees.

CONTACT US

For any query feel free to reach: support@juscorpus.com 

For more such opportunities; Join Team Attorneylex’s WhatsApp group to get notified immediately. Also check us out on Instagram and Twitter

Alternative Dispute Resolution During Pandemic

To get daily updates, Join Team Attorneylex’s WhatsApp group

Also, check us out on Instagram and Twitter

This Article is written by Raashi Suredia and Nupur Misra, students of Army Law College, Pune

INTRODUCTION

Alternative dispute resolution (ADR) alludes to a set of practices and techniques aimed at resolving civil disputes outside traditional legal and administrative forums. It normally covers mediation, arbitration, and a variety of “hybrid” processes by which a third party facilitates the resolution of legal disputes without formal adjudication. These substitutes to adjudication are advocated on a variety of rationale. Potential perks include the reduction of the transaction costs of dispute resolution and the proceedings are quicker as compared to ordinary proceedings; the creation of resolutions that are better suited to the parties’ underlying interests and requisites; and improved ex-post compliance with the terms and conditions of the resolution. 

ADR has gained ubiquitous acceptance among both the general public and the legal profession in recent years and is also being espoused as the means to help settle disputes alongside the court system itself. There are various widely used methods of ADR such as Arbitration, Mediation Negotiation and Conciliation. However, in the present state of affairs where the spread of Coronavirus (COVID-19) has put everything on hold, it is important to talk about its effect on ADR.

The coronavirus global health crisis is significantly impacting communities worldwide. It has caused unparalleled disruptions and has damaged the world’s economy and business relationships. Great numbers of commercial disputes are coming into view as parties are finding it difficult to execute their contractual obligations. There is a likelihood that the crisis will result in a surge of litigation and will as a result defer the resolution of pending court cases. It is the unprecedented delays that should direct the parties towards alternative dispute resolution (ADR). Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) or Virtual ADR has come into play owing to this crisis.

Virtual ADR allows the cases to be resolved in a hassle-free manner and this system there is no need for the parties to travel. Parties to the dispute can communicate with each other through video conferencing which makes it possible for them to hear and see each other. In the case of mediation, the mediator can separate the parties and engage in a mutually agreeable settlement. Greater utilisation of ADR will result in nippy resolution of cases and will also be time and money-saving.

It must be stated that despite it being the need of the hour, there are certain challenges in this process. It is no secret that lawyers have always been averse to technology. Yet, in times like these, learning and adopting technology is essential for survival. Arduous and continuous training will be required for the lawyers to get through the offline to online transition. It is a tough row to hoe to provide internet connectivity to Indian Courts since most of them have poor network connectivity. Adequate security standards will have to be put into place so that the critical data that is stored is not hacked or tampered with in any way.

Like any new initiative, virtual ADR will have its share of complications and glitches. However, it is undoubtedly a step in the right direction. ADR is no longer an alternate mode of resolving disputes. Rather, it is the ideal forum for the speedy, cost-effective resolution of disputes. The current pandemic has reformed the way we think about our lives and daily interactions. However, in unprecedented situations like these, it is much more important to come together and fight, to come out stronger and significantly more evolved.

The emphasis of this article is on mediation and arbitration. The first half of the article covers essential background for understanding ADR by focusing mainly on arbitration and mediation. The other half covers the use of AI in ADR during the pandemic.  

ARBITRATION

Arbitration in India is an age-old conception, originating in ancient India. It is still prevalent today in villages where the seniors of the village or community sit and resolve disputes between villagers and/ or the community. Therefore, it cannot be said that Arbitration as a concept or ADR is a foreign ingress on the Indian legal system. Arbitration is a part of ADR along with other ADR processes like Conciliation and Mediation. Arbitration in India is administered by the Indian Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996. The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 as applicable in India today was created on the lines of the Model Law of the UNCITAL (United Nations Commission on International Trade Law). The popularity of cherry-picking arbitration over mediation and/ or conciliation has created the term Arbitration Dispute Resolution.

Over time processes, procedures and powers concerning Arbitration and the right of parties to the same were incorporated in The Civil Procedure Code, Indian Contract Act, Specific Relief Act and by further incorporation of Indian Arbitration Act 1899, subsequently rescinded by the Indian Arbitration Act of 1940 and then finally by the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 which came into effect from 25th January 1996. The Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996, seeks to consolidate and amend the laws about arbitration as were in force pre 25 January 1996 and seeks to fortify the domestic and international commercial arbitration which includes enforcement of the foreign arbitration awards on the lines of Model Law on International and Commercial Arbitration adopted by UN Commission on International Trade Law, 1985.

MEDIATION

Mediation is a form of ADR, a way of resolving disputes between two or more parties. A third party, the mediator assists the parties to negotiate their settlement (facilitative mediation). In a few cases, mediators may express a view on what might be a fair or reasonable settlement, generally where all the parties agree that the mediator may do so (evaluative mediation). Mediation has a structure, timetable and dynamics which the “ordinary” negotiation has a paucity. The process is private and confidential. The presence of a mediator is the key distinctive feature of the process. There may be no compulsion to go to mediation, but in some cases, any settlement agreement signed by the parties to a dispute will be binding on them. Mediators use numerous methods to open, or mend, dialogue between disputants, aiming to help the parties reach an agreement (with concrete effects) on the disputed matter. Much depends on the mediator’s skills and qualifications. The mediator must be wholly unbiased. Disputants may use mediation in a multiplicity of disputes, such as commercial, legal, diplomatic, workplace, community and family matters. 

USE OF AI IN ADR

With the COVID-19 pandemic hitting the world, the mode of all sorts of transactions has shifted to online methods. The technological resources which were earlier being underutilised are now being used at their optimum best and new advancements are also happening within very short periods to meet the new requirements of people. When the entire economy shifted to online mode and the definition of ‘normal’ changed, the legal world had to adapt to the dynamic scenario as well and accept the ‘new normal’. Cases were put on hold for the pandemic to die down, however, that was not and still is not the case. The legal processes which are tedious in a country like India, where trials take years to be completed, the pandemic, provided an opportunity to the Indian legal system to develop itself and adapt to the change to provide speedy trials. Administration of justice and access to justice is the basic essential as well as an important public service provided to every citizen which cannot be ‘quarantined’ due to the lockdowns put in place for safety. Therefore, the Indian judiciary adapted to the ‘work from home’ approach quite quickly. The Supreme Court issued guidelines for the conduct of virtual hearings, which guidelines directed all High Courts to take necessary steps to implement virtual hearings through video conferencing both for themselves and for the subordinate courts within their jurisdiction. The presence of Artificial Intelligence is however not new to the Indian judiciary and has been in use for a good amount of time. Alternative Dispute Resolution has also incorporated the element of Artificial Intelligence in the pandemic very smoothly and adopted the word Online Dispute Resolution, combining Alternative Dispute Resolution and AI technology used. The pandemic made online dispute resolution gain attraction due to social distancing norms and remote work policies. Online dispute resolution permits resolution by way of mechanisms on the internet and coded algorithms. The COVID-19 pandemic and the AI-enabled virtual communication between parties that are geographically apart, thereby continuing the legal formalities and not putting any hindrance to the ADR methods. The demand for the prediction of trial outcomes through data analytics is as it is high and the AI technology has been able to predict outcomes with appreciable accuracy. Algorithms are used to find the area of settlement between both parties, thereby reducing the need for human contact, which was the main aim of implementing multiple lockdowns in the first place and increasing the speed of dispute resolution. The whole aim of ADR is to not take the case to the court which not only saves the time of the judiciary and the parties involved but also protects the relationship between the parties. The usage of algorithms and since they are prompt, allows the parties to save time by settling matters out of the court directly. These AI-based settlements are also more consistent and uniform across similar cases, simply because they have been formed after time and continued testing which has been done time and again. 

Platforms like Manupatra and Lexis Nexis have been formed after taking into consideration the amount of time that is taken up while researching for case laws, these platforms have been designed in such a way so that they can give the user the required data without going through multiple cases or searches, this proves how well such coded platforms work in benefit of legal professionals. An AI can systematize data according to the user needs and provide that as and when required which in turn would lessen the burden on an individual. The use of AI would also reduce the documentation workload, by quickly assessing and selecting the material document, or for making summaries for documents. As human beings, we all have our biases, opinions and prejudices, but when it comes to AI technology, it is not affected by these mundane weaknesses, it would give answers only after following the rational and logical approach, therefore, eliminating the scope of human emotions interfering the case. 

CONCLUSION

The primary aim of arbitration is to get a neutral third party to resolve disputes equally without unnecessary costs or delays. The core aim of the Arbitration process is to save time and costs. AI will be complementary to the process of arbitration, as it is developed independently with its thinking and reasoning power and it is prompt and quick to solve queries, both aims of arbitration will be achieved. India is still a developing country and even though we are exploring new horizons in the field of computer technology time and again, development not only includes new advancements, it also requires optimum utilization of pre-existing resources to ensure sustainability, which is exactly what will happen when AI technology is incorporated into the ADR wholly and completely, reduction in individual workload, development of nation and sustainability of the world at large.

ENDNOTES:
  1. Nilava Bandyopadhyay, India: Future of Litigation and ADR in India – Post COVID-19, MONDAQ (Mar 27, 2021), https://www.mondaq.com
  2. Masood Ahmed, Alternative Dispute Resolution during the Covid-19 Crisis and Beyond, TAYLOR AND FRANCIS ONLINE (Feb 25, 2021), https://www.tandfonline.
  3. Anubhav Pandey, All you need to know about Alternative Dispute Resolution, IPLEADERS (May 9, 2017), https://blog.ipleaders.in/adr-alternative-dispute-resolution/.
  4. Lalit Sharma, Evolution of ADR Mechanisms in India, SCC ONLINE (Feb 7, 2021), https://www.scconline.com/blog/post/2021/02/07/evolution-of-adr-mechanisms-in-india/.
  5. Manoj K Singh, The future of arbitration in India: Strengthening the process of alternative dispute resolution, THE ECONOMIC TIMES (Apr 17, 2021), https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/small-biz/legal/the-future-of-arbitration-in-india-strengthening-the-process-of-alternative-dispute-resolution/articleshow/.
  6. Michael Finnegan, Alternative Dispute Resolution: benefits and use during (and after) the COVID-19 crisis, BURGES-SALMON (Jul 17, 2020), https://www.burges-salmon.com/news-and-insight/legal-updates/private-wealth/alternative-dispute-resolution-benefits-and-use-during-and-after-covid-19.

For more Articles, Case Summary, Internship / Job Opportunities etc.; Join Team Attorneylex’s WhatsApp group to get notified immediately. Also check us out on Instagram and Twitter

Vaccination Laws and Present Pandemic Situations in India

Vaccine save lives; fear endangers them 

Jeffrey Kluger

INTRODUCTION: 

Since time immemorial of the human civilisation, we the human beings had been facing lots of horrible situations which endangered our existence. If we look back then we will find that the history of the pandemic is an ancient one; the first recorded pandemic was 340 years ago before the birth of Jesus Christ. But the years of 2019-2020 have revealed that we are still far away from the era of modernisation and we need more time to develop significantly in the field of medicine about the impact about health science and education. In this topic, we are going to discuss the impact of this ongoing pandemic upon the vaccination laws and vice versa. Before that, we must examine the history of vaccination laws in India. Dr Haffkine developed the plague vaccine in 1897, which is considered to be the first vaccine developed in India. Throughout the world, there are 27 causative agents, against which vaccines are available and expanded, and more are to be set against the rest targeted agents, which are known. But from this event of the pandemic of COVID-19, we can assure that there are also several causative agents, which are unknown to us. So, the development of vaccines for those novel agents is a very tough task. Now, while discussing the situation of India, we must be firstly aware of the vaccine laws, because, without those rules and regulation and laws, it would herm the rights of the people. So, several organisations, research centres, laboratories etc., where such research regarding the development of a vaccine is taking place, must maintain and follow the vaccine laws, so that, rights of the public at large or an individual is also maintained.

Moreover, after the development of the vaccine and its approval, it must be applied to control any situation of epidemic and pandemic. But, what will happen if a person doesn’t give his or her consent? For these reasons, only vaccine laws are passed. Immunity of a single individual provides the security of the immunity of the community.

HISTORY OF THE CONCEPT OF VACCINATION AND VACCINATION LAWS IN INDIA: 

The concept and process of vaccination are more than 3000 years old, which was originated and flourished in the ancient Indian Peninsula (Northern and Eastern India) as a form of variolation and inoculation. The evidence of the existence of variolation is also elaborately described in the Sanskrit text called Sacteya, mainly developed to Dhanwantari, the physician. Then with the transmission of education, the technique of vaccination may have spread to China then Africa, Turkey and ultimately reached to England and America.

In the 18th century, Smallpox affected almost the whole of the world, but, it was reported much earlier in India in 1545 AD. Historians and Physicians suggest ‘smallpox’ as ‘Indian Plague’. Edward Jenner developed the first vaccine of Smallpox in 1796, which arrived in May 1802. Anna Dusthall a three years old child from Bombay, become the 1st person in India to receive Smallpox vaccine on June 14, 1802. The compulsory Vaccination Act was passed in India in 1892 for the 1st time. The aim or motto of the act was to ensure higher coverage with Smallpox and reduce the epidemic. Before 1850, the vaccines were imported from Great Britain. After the 19th century, the vaccine material supply was increased in India, and as a result, more focus was given upon the manufacture of vaccines in India itself. During this time there occurred Cholera epidemic in Bengal and other parts of India. Dr Haffkine was requested to come in India and conduct Cholera vaccine trial in India, which was conducted in 1893. So, here comes the first situation, where we must consider the vaccination laws that, “what shall be the law when a scientist from abroad is brought in India to make vaccine trials?” Then in 1896, a plague epidemic in India has started. Before 1892 The Vaccination Act in 1880, specifically to ban existing inoculation practices, while making it compulsory for children to be vaccinated. So, the history of vaccination law in India can be classified into two parts: –

Vaccination and Present Pandemic Situation: 

During this pandemic situation doctors and health experts of all over the world are encouraging the mass population to take precautions to prevent transmission through the method of physical distancing, hand sanitising, boosting of immunity and musk using. But for the third world countries like India, it is not at all possible to take all such measures because here the food is more desirable than sanitiser, the cloth is more preferable than musk and shelter are more urgent than physical distancing. India is a country where still in the 21st century there is suffering for a single drop of drinking water in the states like Maharashtra, Odisha; where water is very much needed to quench thirst rather than hand washing.

The vaccine is a preventive measure to save ourselves from the clutches of the virus. So, if the Government makes vaccination mandatory, then ultimately, it will be beneficial for the whole society. Because mass interest is more important than individual interest and individual interest is more important than personal sentiment. Here if anyone denies taking the vaccine, then what will happen? Would he pay the society for his mischievous work? There is a well-known maxim in the legal field that “SALUS POPULI EST SUPREMA LEX.”, Which means public welfare is the highest law. Every member of society surrenders his/her welfare before the interest of the community. According to Ezekiel Emanuel, “vaccines are the most cost-effective health care interventions…”. So from my point of view, compulsory vaccination is very much needed so that we can live without any fear, we can breathe in a world where there would be no barrier to musk.

Vaccination Laws In The Light Of Nuremberg Code Whether Violative Of Human Rights Or Not:  

Recently Facebook, Instagram posts shared thousand times, claim that vaccines directly violate the Nuremberg Code ( a set of research ethics principles for human experimentation established after second world war). The claim is false. “The Nuremberg Code is about doing human experiments, not vaccination,” said Dr Jonathan D. Moreno (Prof. of Bio-ethics at University of Pennsylvania.” Vaccines are in no way a violation of the Nuremberg Code.

Recent Light Of Hope: 

Despite all brawl between the groups who are in favour of mandatory vaccination and who are against it, there is a great light of hope that Russia launches COVID vaccine named Sputnik-V and Russian health department assured the world that the persons upon whom the vaccine was tested are responding, including the daughter of Russian President Vladimir Putin. 

Doctors of the whole world are not sure that what will be the accurate dose of the vaccine, or is there any necessity for any further booster dose or not? But when we get the vaccine then also it will take a long time to come within reach of every citizen of the country. First of all, it will be given to the doctors, health workers, polices who are the lifeline of the society, then it will be given to an endangered person like old persons, children, pregnant women. Restest of the population will get it. We can say in a racy voice that if we intake the vaccine in our body, then we will become a protected warrior to fight against the virus, and still, we cherish the hope that ‘we shall overcome.’

Conclusion:  

So, in the end, it’s very compulsory to say that vaccination is much more important than everything in today’s pandemic situation. Rate of unemployment and beggary is rising in India. At about 12 people among 100 die due to poverty in India each year. Therefore can’t we are a little more dedicated and sympathetic towards them? Can’t we think to free vaccination through the third world country, where, poverty death is not much less than pandemic death?

For this reason, there is a high demand for free vaccination laws for poor people or economically weaker sections of society. Moreover, during this pandemic (COVID-19), many beggars earn less than 5% of their daily income through beggary. Many hawkers have lost their sale due to cancellation of local trains to avoid social gathering. Many businessmen, employers in private sectors have made a significant loss, and some of them faced retrenchment too. What will happen to them if vaccines are not available to free of cost? Being a student in the law field, my last step, which can be taken is, to pray for a free vaccination law, for economically weaker sections of the society or for those people, who have lost their livelihood during this pandemic. 

Author’s: Sayan Pramanik & Sinjini Sanyal
S. K. Acharya Institute of Law