Tag Archives: #legal

Supreme Court fines Advocate Prashant Bhushan with Rs 1

After finding Advocate Prashant Bhushan guilty of contempt of Court for his tweets on the Judiciary, the Supreme Court Bench of Justices Arun Mishra, BR Gavai and Krishna Murari finally sentenced him on August 31st, 2020 to a token fine of Rs. 1. The Bench also stated that if Advocate Prashant Bhushan defaults on this payment then he may be sent to prison for three months and may be debarred from practicing for three years.

The Court had given several opportunities to the Advocate to express his regret and apologise. However, Bhushan had issued a supplementary statement standing by his tweets and refusing to apologise. The Court also pointed out that Bhushan had given publicity to the events of his case by involving the press in it. That being said, the Court added that its decisions are not to be influenced by publication of opinions in the press.

Source: Bar and Bench

Lloyd Law College

Lloyd Law College is a Law school in India. Lloyd Law College is located in Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh. It offers courses like five years of integrated courses in B.ALL.B, three years LL.B and LLM. Lloyd Law College is one of the colleges in India to provide conjoined degree course of B.A. and LL.B that combine law degrees with papers in liberal arts. 

Courses and departments

 The B.A. course is divided into ten semesters with five papers in each of the semesters. The courses are designed in such a way that it combines law degrees with papers in liberal arts in a way that is helpful for the students to cover the course systematically. The three year law course follows a semester system of examination and gives specialisation in different areas of law. All the courses are approved by the Bar Council of India and are affiliated to the CCS University.

Infrastructure

Lloyd Law College is located in Knowledge Park – II, Greater Noida (U.P/ NCR). The law college is spread over 4.5 acres of non-residential campus comprising three multi-storey blocks.

The campus had its first four-story building in 2003 and currently has main academic block comprising sixteen lecture theatres/class rooms, as well as four-story facility centre containing 3000 textual collections, journal subscription of last 56 years and regular intake of newspapers & magazines.

Facilities

Lloyd Law College, Greater Noida has infrastructure and facilities that support the smooth functioning of the college. The institute provides accommodation to students and has Aryan Residency for boys and Amandam Hostel for girls. These hostels have all the essential fasciitis such as sports, gym, laundry, etc. The library has an enriched collection of books and is a centre of attraction for the book lovers. Transportation facilities are provided to the students that help students in travelling.

  • Transport Facilities – The College provides transportation facilities and has its fleet of buses that operates on no profit or loss basis and helps students in travelling.
  • Hostels – The institute has a boy’s hostel named Aryan Residency and one girl’s hostel called Anandam that provides safe and secured accommodation to the students. The hostels serve a four-time meal and have all the essential fasciitis such as sports, gym, laundry, etc.
  • Moot Court Hall – Lloyd Law College, Greater Noida has a Moot Court Hall that has a seating which is used to practice advocacy and organise various competitions.
  • Library – The institute has a library that has an enriched collection of books and is a centre of attraction for the book readers.

College faculty

The faculties at Lloyd Law College are experts in various disciplines of law and promote excellence in learning. They are specialised in Environment Law, International Law, Jurisprudence Law and Constitutional Law. The students are nurtured and have a thirst for knowledge and a strong sense of integrity and professionalism. 

Activities

Lloyd Law College launched the First Prof. N. R. Madhava Menon SAARCLAW Mooting Competition & Law Students Conference in 2016, under technical support from MILAT-Menon Institute of Legal Advocacy, Trivandrum.

The reform brought about in Indian legal education by the pioneering of forts of Prof. N.R. Madhava Menon during the last three decades through the Five Year Integrated B.A.LL.B. Programme under the National Law School experiment was the inspiration for Lloyd Law College to launch the Mooting Competition in the Name of Padma Shree Prof. N. R. Madhava Menon. On retirement from active service, he continues to contribute to the cause of legal education and professional development through the Menon Institute of Legal Advocacy Training (MILA T), which he presides. Lloyd Law College is proud to be associated with MILAT in organising the Mooting. There are two stages of the competition: The Indian Round and the SAARC round. Every year five best teams represent India in the SAARC Round. Apart from India, every SAARC country can select/nominate two teams to represent their country in SAARC rounds.

How to Apply

Students are admitted to the institute through a written common test, which is generally conducted in May. Apart from the score in the LET a student must have passed the 10+2 or equivalent examination in any stream with at least 45% marks with English as a compulsory subject.

Placement

Lloyd Law College is one of the best institutes in India. Around 70% of the students got placed through Campus Placements and got a good salary package. The median salary package offered was 7.5 LPA.

Best thing

 The best thing in Lloyd Law College is professors are cooperative and helpful for better understanding in Law. They guide us in many aspects and making the thing clear. There are many activities which are very helpful in the future. They also provide an internship and get motivated for it.

Worst thing

Everything is well organised, and there are not any worst thing on the campus and are different aspects in which students get new skills in which it enhances the future.

Submitted By: Astha Chaurasia

Vaccination Laws and Present Pandemic Situations in India

Vaccine save lives; fear endangers them 

Jeffrey Kluger

INTRODUCTION: 

Since time immemorial of the human civilisation, we the human beings had been facing lots of horrible situations which endangered our existence. If we look back then we will find that the history of the pandemic is an ancient one; the first recorded pandemic was 340 years ago before the birth of Jesus Christ. But the years of 2019-2020 have revealed that we are still far away from the era of modernisation and we need more time to develop significantly in the field of medicine about the impact about health science and education. In this topic, we are going to discuss the impact of this ongoing pandemic upon the vaccination laws and vice versa. Before that, we must examine the history of vaccination laws in India. Dr Haffkine developed the plague vaccine in 1897, which is considered to be the first vaccine developed in India. Throughout the world, there are 27 causative agents, against which vaccines are available and expanded, and more are to be set against the rest targeted agents, which are known. But from this event of the pandemic of COVID-19, we can assure that there are also several causative agents, which are unknown to us. So, the development of vaccines for those novel agents is a very tough task. Now, while discussing the situation of India, we must be firstly aware of the vaccine laws, because, without those rules and regulation and laws, it would herm the rights of the people. So, several organisations, research centres, laboratories etc., where such research regarding the development of a vaccine is taking place, must maintain and follow the vaccine laws, so that, rights of the public at large or an individual is also maintained.

Moreover, after the development of the vaccine and its approval, it must be applied to control any situation of epidemic and pandemic. But, what will happen if a person doesn’t give his or her consent? For these reasons, only vaccine laws are passed. Immunity of a single individual provides the security of the immunity of the community.

HISTORY OF THE CONCEPT OF VACCINATION AND VACCINATION LAWS IN INDIA: 

The concept and process of vaccination are more than 3000 years old, which was originated and flourished in the ancient Indian Peninsula (Northern and Eastern India) as a form of variolation and inoculation. The evidence of the existence of variolation is also elaborately described in the Sanskrit text called Sacteya, mainly developed to Dhanwantari, the physician. Then with the transmission of education, the technique of vaccination may have spread to China then Africa, Turkey and ultimately reached to England and America.

In the 18th century, Smallpox affected almost the whole of the world, but, it was reported much earlier in India in 1545 AD. Historians and Physicians suggest ‘smallpox’ as ‘Indian Plague’. Edward Jenner developed the first vaccine of Smallpox in 1796, which arrived in May 1802. Anna Dusthall a three years old child from Bombay, become the 1st person in India to receive Smallpox vaccine on June 14, 1802. The compulsory Vaccination Act was passed in India in 1892 for the 1st time. The aim or motto of the act was to ensure higher coverage with Smallpox and reduce the epidemic. Before 1850, the vaccines were imported from Great Britain. After the 19th century, the vaccine material supply was increased in India, and as a result, more focus was given upon the manufacture of vaccines in India itself. During this time there occurred Cholera epidemic in Bengal and other parts of India. Dr Haffkine was requested to come in India and conduct Cholera vaccine trial in India, which was conducted in 1893. So, here comes the first situation, where we must consider the vaccination laws that, “what shall be the law when a scientist from abroad is brought in India to make vaccine trials?” Then in 1896, a plague epidemic in India has started. Before 1892 The Vaccination Act in 1880, specifically to ban existing inoculation practices, while making it compulsory for children to be vaccinated. So, the history of vaccination law in India can be classified into two parts: –

Vaccination and Present Pandemic Situation: 

During this pandemic situation doctors and health experts of all over the world are encouraging the mass population to take precautions to prevent transmission through the method of physical distancing, hand sanitising, boosting of immunity and musk using. But for the third world countries like India, it is not at all possible to take all such measures because here the food is more desirable than sanitiser, the cloth is more preferable than musk and shelter are more urgent than physical distancing. India is a country where still in the 21st century there is suffering for a single drop of drinking water in the states like Maharashtra, Odisha; where water is very much needed to quench thirst rather than hand washing.

The vaccine is a preventive measure to save ourselves from the clutches of the virus. So, if the Government makes vaccination mandatory, then ultimately, it will be beneficial for the whole society. Because mass interest is more important than individual interest and individual interest is more important than personal sentiment. Here if anyone denies taking the vaccine, then what will happen? Would he pay the society for his mischievous work? There is a well-known maxim in the legal field that “SALUS POPULI EST SUPREMA LEX.”, Which means public welfare is the highest law. Every member of society surrenders his/her welfare before the interest of the community. According to Ezekiel Emanuel, “vaccines are the most cost-effective health care interventions…”. So from my point of view, compulsory vaccination is very much needed so that we can live without any fear, we can breathe in a world where there would be no barrier to musk.

Vaccination Laws In The Light Of Nuremberg Code Whether Violative Of Human Rights Or Not:  

Recently Facebook, Instagram posts shared thousand times, claim that vaccines directly violate the Nuremberg Code ( a set of research ethics principles for human experimentation established after second world war). The claim is false. “The Nuremberg Code is about doing human experiments, not vaccination,” said Dr Jonathan D. Moreno (Prof. of Bio-ethics at University of Pennsylvania.” Vaccines are in no way a violation of the Nuremberg Code.

Recent Light Of Hope: 

Despite all brawl between the groups who are in favour of mandatory vaccination and who are against it, there is a great light of hope that Russia launches COVID vaccine named Sputnik-V and Russian health department assured the world that the persons upon whom the vaccine was tested are responding, including the daughter of Russian President Vladimir Putin. 

Doctors of the whole world are not sure that what will be the accurate dose of the vaccine, or is there any necessity for any further booster dose or not? But when we get the vaccine then also it will take a long time to come within reach of every citizen of the country. First of all, it will be given to the doctors, health workers, polices who are the lifeline of the society, then it will be given to an endangered person like old persons, children, pregnant women. Restest of the population will get it. We can say in a racy voice that if we intake the vaccine in our body, then we will become a protected warrior to fight against the virus, and still, we cherish the hope that ‘we shall overcome.’

Conclusion:  

So, in the end, it’s very compulsory to say that vaccination is much more important than everything in today’s pandemic situation. Rate of unemployment and beggary is rising in India. At about 12 people among 100 die due to poverty in India each year. Therefore can’t we are a little more dedicated and sympathetic towards them? Can’t we think to free vaccination through the third world country, where, poverty death is not much less than pandemic death?

For this reason, there is a high demand for free vaccination laws for poor people or economically weaker sections of society. Moreover, during this pandemic (COVID-19), many beggars earn less than 5% of their daily income through beggary. Many hawkers have lost their sale due to cancellation of local trains to avoid social gathering. Many businessmen, employers in private sectors have made a significant loss, and some of them faced retrenchment too. What will happen to them if vaccines are not available to free of cost? Being a student in the law field, my last step, which can be taken is, to pray for a free vaccination law, for economically weaker sections of the society or for those people, who have lost their livelihood during this pandemic. 

Author’s: Sayan Pramanik & Sinjini Sanyal
S. K. Acharya Institute of Law

Sc disposes off the petition for conducting final semester exams

On Friday, 28th August, the Supreme Court disposed off the petitions challenging the guidelines that had been issued by the University Grants Commission (UGC) for conducting final semester exams by 30th September. The bench comprising Justices Ashok Bhushan, R Subhash Reddy and M R Shah gave the following orders:

  1. The Bench had refused the prayer to quash UGC Guidelines for holding final semester exams.
  2. The directions of the State Disaster Management Authority for cancelling the exams are to prevail over the UGC.
  3. However, the direction of SDMA to pass students on previous performance is beyond the scope of the Disaster Management Act.
  4. States/UTs cannot promote students based on final year exams. However, they can seek postponement of the exams due to COVID 19. 

The UGC claimed that then Order was given in the best interest of the students.

Source: Live Law

Flipkart Moves SC Over CCI Investigation

Flipkart moved the Supreme Court against an investigation by the Competition Commission of India. The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal had ordered the CCI investigation in March, alleging Flipkart of violating section 4 of the Competition Act, 2002 by abusing its dominant position in the market.

The Competition Commission of India had already given a clean chit to Flipkart in 2018 when the All India Online Vendors Association filed a complaint against Flipkart. However, NCLAT has ordered a CCI Investigation for allegations of abuse of dominance, setting aside the CCI order of 2018. Even though Flipkart had appealed in March, the case was only registered in July. AIOVA and CCI are the respondents to the case which is yet to be admitted by the Supreme Court. AIOVA has already filed a caveat in the Supreme Court to ensure it is heard on any matter of the case. 

Source: CNBC TV 18

National Online Quiz Competition on Constitutional Law and IPC: Organised by Team Attorneylex and Legal Monkey

About Team Attorneylex

Team Attorneylex is a newly developed organization that is devoted to the law students of the country. Our primary purpose is to guide the law students in their legal research, content writing, analysing the case laws, read or understand the courts’ judgments, etc. because we believe that these things are an essential part of the legal profession.

About Legal Monkey

Legal Monkey was founded by two young engineers in the year 2019, Legal Monkey was born to provide business solutions, Consultation, Conceputed Education With Legal Advice. Our aim is very clear to spread legal literacy and develop more entrepreneurs in India.

Our key concept is to provide the easiest business solutions & consultation to new startups and Existing companies to grow rapidly.

We have an Educated and professional legal & financial advising team that help each and every individual & client on our key concept.

About the National Online Quiz Competition

Team Attorneylex is organizing its First Online National Quiz Competition on Constitutional Law and IPC scheduled to be held on 5th September 2020.

Eligibility

Team Attorneylex looks forward to participation from school students, law aspirants, students pursuing 5-year law and 3-years law, and LLM courses. Professionals from the legal fraternity are also invited to participate in the Quiz.

Important Dates & Timing

  • Last date for registration: 4th September 2020, 11:59 PM
  • Competition Date: 5th September 2020, 05:00 PM
  • Declaration of Results: 7th September

Venue – Online (Google forms)

Details

  • The quiz competition is not a team-based competition, and thus, each student shall participate individually.
  • The Quiz shall consist of Constitutional law and IPC questions, including significant/landmark judgments.
  • It shall consist of 50 MCQs.
  • The total time limit for the Quiz is 25 minutes
  • Every question carries one mark, and there will be no negative marking.
  • In the case of a tie, Time will be considered (Person who submits early will be given preference).

Registration Fees

Rs. 20/- per participant.

Payments details

Paytm/ G-pay/Phonepe- 9616696008 (Gaurav yadav)
Paytm UPI- 9616696008@paytm
Bhim UPI- 9616696008@upi

Bank details-

Name- Gaurav Yadav
Bank – Oriental Bank of Commerce
Account Number- 03842193000248
IFSC Code- ORBC0100394

Registration Link

Interested candidates can fill the registration form – Click here

or, https://forms.gle/GREHkf1YZUcFmmnbA

General Rules

  • The registered candidates will be added to a WhatsApp group for updates.
  • The Quiz results will be declared on the social media platforms of the Team Attorneylex and the Website of Team Attorneylex.
  • Team Attorneylex will not be responsible for any technical error in paying the registration fee for the quiz competition or any connectivity/device failure during the Quiz.
  • The results declared would be final and the authority vests with Team Attorneylex to change or modify the same.

Perks

  • 1st Position: cash prize Rs. 250/- + certificate of Excellence + Article publication on the website + Online Internship opportunity with the Team Attorneylex.
  • 2nd Position: cash prize Rs. 150/- + certificate of Excellence + Article publication on the website + Online Internship Opportunity with Team Attorneylex.
  • 3rd Position: cash prize Rs. 100/- + certificate of Excellence + Article publication on the website.
  • Certificate of merit to top 20 performers.
  • E – participation Certificate will be provided to all the participants.

If you have any queries feel free to contact

Vanshika – 07055460463
Gaurav -09616696008

Emailcontact@teamattorneylex.in

Website:

teamattorneylex.in

legalmonkey.in

SC slams Centre as appearing to hide behind RBI

The Supreme Court has rebuked the Centre for not taking a stand on allowing moratorium on the charging of interest on loans and the interest on the part during the moratorium period declared amidst the pandemic. The Bench comprising of Justices Ashok Bhushan, R Subhash Reddy and M R Shah went on to comment “it appears as if the Centre was hiding behind the RBI decision on this issue when it had ample powers under the Disaster Management Act to decide whether it could stop banks from charging interest on deferred EMIs and stop interest on interest for the moratorium period.” The Bench has directed the Central Government to file an affidavit within a week, which expires on 31st August, taking a stand and deciding whether interest can be waived or it can stop charging interest on interest accrued during the period of moratorium.

Source: India Legal

PM CARES to finance two COVID-19 hospitals in Bihar

The Prime Minister of India has announced through his tweets on Monday that the Prime Minister’s Citizen Assistance and Relief in Emergency Situations Fund will finance two makeshift COVID 19 dedicated hospitals in Bihar.  These 500-bed hospitals are going to be located at Patna and Muzaffarpur and will be inaugurated soon. The PM has pointed out the features of these hospitals in a series of tweets, saying the hospitals will contain 375 regular beds with 125 beds having ventilators. All the beds are to have oxygen supply. Further, the Prime Minister has also revealed that the Defence Research and Development Organisation will construct the hospital and the Armed Forces Medical Services will supply the doctors. Bihar is one of the 10 states to show the highest COVID 19 positive cases in the country.

Hadiya Marriage Case

           

Facts:-

The petitioner (father )filed a case on the ground that Hadiya (originally Akhila Ashokan) was deceived into marrying her husband, Mr. Shafin Jahan and forcibly converted to Islam. I.e, He alleged that Hadiya had been misled and forced to become a Muslim.

Question of law:- 

  • Does the High Court have the power to annul the marriage of an adult under Article 226?
  • Does marriage being the most crucial decision of life, can be taken only with the active involvement of her parents, and no legal adult consent is necessary?

Held:- 

  • The writ of habeas corpus is ‘a great constitutional privilege’ or ‘the first security of civil liberty.’ It is a remedy against illegal detention, which affects the liberty and freedom of the detainee. In this case, the High Court misused the habeas corpus. When Hadiya appeared before the High Court, she stated that she was not under illegal confinement. The High Court has no power to decide the ‘just’ way of life or ‘correct’ course of living for Hadiya. 
  • Parens patriae is the power of the State to intervene against an abusive or negligent parent or guardian. The State acts as the parent of such an individual. The courts can invoke this role only in exceptional cases where the individual is either mentally incompetent, underage, or has either no parent/legal guardian or abusive one.
  •  The right to marry a person of one’s choice is integral to Article 21. The High Court was wrong in using its powers under Article 226 to annul Hadiya’s marriage with Shafin Jahan.

Submitted By: Priya Singh

https://lawmentor.in/2022/03/13/hadiya-marriage-case/

DAHD mulls over change in penalty in Prevention of Animal Cruelty,1960

Union Animal Husbandry and Dairying Secretary, Atul Chaturvedi appears to be mulling over Section 11 Sub Section (1) of Prevention of Animal Cruelty Act, 1960 that provides the penalty for inflicting any form of cruelty on animals to be not less than Rs 10 and not more than Rs 50. He has expressed that his ministry is examining the rising cases of animal cruelty and is contemplating increasing the fine to make the Act more stringent and prevent such cases.

The 60-year-old Act stipulates the provision of penalising people who inflict any kind of cruelty defined in the section with a meagre amount of fine. Under the same law, none of the actions identified as ‘cruelty’ under Section 11 subsection (1) is cognisable except organising fights and shooting matches that use animals. Several animal rights activists and party members have demanded a change in such unreasonably low penalties.

Source: The Hindu