Category Archives: Articles

Articles

Vaccination Laws and Present Pandemic Situations in India

Leave a comment

Vaccine save lives; fear endangers them 

Jeffrey Kluger

INTRODUCTION: 

Since time immemorial of the human civilisation, we the human beings had been facing lots of horrible situations which endangered our existence. If we look back then we will find that the history of the pandemic is an ancient one; the first recorded pandemic was 340 years ago before the birth of Jesus Christ. But the years of 2019-2020 have revealed that we are still far away from the era of modernisation and we need more time to develop significantly in the field of medicine about the impact about health science and education. In this topic, we are going to discuss the impact of this ongoing pandemic upon the vaccination laws and vice versa. Before that, we must examine the history of vaccination laws in India. Dr Haffkine developed the plague vaccine in 1897, which is considered to be the first vaccine developed in India. Throughout the world, there are 27 causative agents, against which vaccines are available and expanded, and more are to be set against the rest targeted agents, which are known. But from this event of the pandemic of COVID-19, we can assure that there are also several causative agents, which are unknown to us. So, the development of vaccines for those novel agents is a very tough task. Now, while discussing the situation of India, we must be firstly aware of the vaccine laws, because, without those rules and regulation and laws, it would herm the rights of the people. So, several organisations, research centres, laboratories etc., where such research regarding the development of a vaccine is taking place, must maintain and follow the vaccine laws, so that, rights of the public at large or an individual is also maintained.

Moreover, after the development of the vaccine and its approval, it must be applied to control any situation of epidemic and pandemic. But, what will happen if a person doesn’t give his or her consent? For these reasons, only vaccine laws are passed. Immunity of a single individual provides the security of the immunity of the community.

HISTORY OF THE CONCEPT OF VACCINATION AND VACCINATION LAWS IN INDIA: 

The concept and process of vaccination are more than 3000 years old, which was originated and flourished in the ancient Indian Peninsula (Northern and Eastern India) as a form of variolation and inoculation. The evidence of the existence of variolation is also elaborately described in the Sanskrit text called Sacteya, mainly developed to Dhanwantari, the physician. Then with the transmission of education, the technique of vaccination may have spread to China then Africa, Turkey and ultimately reached to England and America.

In the 18th century, Smallpox affected almost the whole of the world, but, it was reported much earlier in India in 1545 AD. Historians and Physicians suggest ‘smallpox’ as ‘Indian Plague’. Edward Jenner developed the first vaccine of Smallpox in 1796, which arrived in May 1802. Anna Dusthall a three years old child from Bombay, become the 1st person in India to receive Smallpox vaccine on June 14, 1802. The compulsory Vaccination Act was passed in India in 1892 for the 1st time. The aim or motto of the act was to ensure higher coverage with Smallpox and reduce the epidemic. Before 1850, the vaccines were imported from Great Britain. After the 19th century, the vaccine material supply was increased in India, and as a result, more focus was given upon the manufacture of vaccines in India itself. During this time there occurred Cholera epidemic in Bengal and other parts of India. Dr Haffkine was requested to come in India and conduct Cholera vaccine trial in India, which was conducted in 1893. So, here comes the first situation, where we must consider the vaccination laws that, “what shall be the law when a scientist from abroad is brought in India to make vaccine trials?” Then in 1896, a plague epidemic in India has started. Before 1892 The Vaccination Act in 1880, specifically to ban existing inoculation practices, while making it compulsory for children to be vaccinated. So, the history of vaccination law in India can be classified into two parts: –

Vaccination and Present Pandemic Situation: 

During this pandemic situation doctors and health experts of all over the world are encouraging the mass population to take precautions to prevent transmission through the method of physical distancing, hand sanitising, boosting of immunity and musk using. But for the third world countries like India, it is not at all possible to take all such measures because here the food is more desirable than sanitiser, the cloth is more preferable than musk and shelter are more urgent than physical distancing. India is a country where still in the 21st century there is suffering for a single drop of drinking water in the states like Maharashtra, Odisha; where water is very much needed to quench thirst rather than hand washing.

The vaccine is a preventive measure to save ourselves from the clutches of the virus. So, if the Government makes vaccination mandatory, then ultimately, it will be beneficial for the whole society. Because mass interest is more important than individual interest and individual interest is more important than personal sentiment. Here if anyone denies taking the vaccine, then what will happen? Would he pay the society for his mischievous work? There is a well-known maxim in the legal field that “SALUS POPULI EST SUPREMA LEX.”, Which means public welfare is the highest law. Every member of society surrenders his/her welfare before the interest of the community. According to Ezekiel Emanuel, “vaccines are the most cost-effective health care interventions…”. So from my point of view, compulsory vaccination is very much needed so that we can live without any fear, we can breathe in a world where there would be no barrier to musk.

Vaccination Laws In The Light Of Nuremberg Code Whether Violative Of Human Rights Or Not:  

Recently Facebook, Instagram posts shared thousand times, claim that vaccines directly violate the Nuremberg Code ( a set of research ethics principles for human experimentation established after second world war). The claim is false. “The Nuremberg Code is about doing human experiments, not vaccination,” said Dr Jonathan D. Moreno (Prof. of Bio-ethics at University of Pennsylvania.” Vaccines are in no way a violation of the Nuremberg Code.

Recent Light Of Hope: 

Despite all brawl between the groups who are in favour of mandatory vaccination and who are against it, there is a great light of hope that Russia launches COVID vaccine named Sputnik-V and Russian health department assured the world that the persons upon whom the vaccine was tested are responding, including the daughter of Russian President Vladimir Putin. 

Doctors of the whole world are not sure that what will be the accurate dose of the vaccine, or is there any necessity for any further booster dose or not? But when we get the vaccine then also it will take a long time to come within reach of every citizen of the country. First of all, it will be given to the doctors, health workers, polices who are the lifeline of the society, then it will be given to an endangered person like old persons, children, pregnant women. Restest of the population will get it. We can say in a racy voice that if we intake the vaccine in our body, then we will become a protected warrior to fight against the virus, and still, we cherish the hope that ‘we shall overcome.’

Conclusion:  

So, in the end, it’s very compulsory to say that vaccination is much more important than everything in today’s pandemic situation. Rate of unemployment and beggary is rising in India. At about 12 people among 100 die due to poverty in India each year. Therefore can’t we are a little more dedicated and sympathetic towards them? Can’t we think to free vaccination through the third world country, where, poverty death is not much less than pandemic death?

For this reason, there is a high demand for free vaccination laws for poor people or economically weaker sections of society. Moreover, during this pandemic (COVID-19), many beggars earn less than 5% of their daily income through beggary. Many hawkers have lost their sale due to cancellation of local trains to avoid social gathering. Many businessmen, employers in private sectors have made a significant loss, and some of them faced retrenchment too. What will happen to them if vaccines are not available to free of cost? Being a student in the law field, my last step, which can be taken is, to pray for a free vaccination law, for economically weaker sections of the society or for those people, who have lost their livelihood during this pandemic. 

Author’s: Sayan Pramanik & Sinjini Sanyal
S. K. Acharya Institute of Law

Articles

HEALTH AND REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS OF WOMEN: A COMMENT ON THE ABORTION LAWS

Leave a comment

This article is written by Abhishek Yadav, Maharaja Agrasen Institute of Management Studies, Rohini

Introduction

Meaning of abortion– According to the medical terms, abortion is the process of complete or partial separation of the products of conception from the uterine wall complete or partial expulsion from the uterine cavity before the age of viability. The meaning of abortion is the termination of pregnancy by any way or any method ( induced or spontaneous) before the fetus is sufficiently developed to survive independently (fetus which is less than 20 days of pregnancy).1

One more definition is when the delivery of the fetus/baby that is less than 500 grams. This is a technique to remove a developing Embryo or Foetus from the maternal uterus. Abortion is a term of pre mature termination of pregnancy prior to birth. It is a technique of removing a developing foetus or embryo from the maternal uterus.
Reproductive rights are the legal rights of a women which gives them the freedom to control their own reproduction system or pregnancy. And this right also includes the rights to make their own decision regarding her reproduction free from any discrimination and violence.
In India, the age of viability is maximum of 28 weeks, and the cause of sudden abortion in most of the cases are not known. In most of the village areas of Madhya Pradesh and Rajasthan sex determination is a common practice which ends up in the form of abortion if the child to be born is female. It is a criminal offence but even after that this act still in practice.

Few common reasons behind that are:
 The practice of dowry system
 Sex with a minor girl
 Prime preference is given to a male child
 The financial burden on the family of the girl child
 Rape victims


Types of Abortion

Abortion generally evokes an image of “induced abortion”. There are mainly two types of abortion and those are:

Spontaneous – (according to medical author William c. Shield Jr., MD, FACP, FACR) A miscarriage, that is, any pregnancy that is not viable (the fetus cannot survive) or in which the fetus is born before the 20th week of pregnancy. Spontaneous abortion occurs in at least 15-20% of all recognized pregnancies and usually takes place before the 13th week of pregnancy.

Induced – as we discussed spontaneous abortion is purely accidental but induced abortion is opposed to spontaneous abortion and it happens because of some form of external interference or intervention ( physical, medical or surgical) starts and complete the process of extraction/expulsion of the product of conception.

Types of spontaneous abortion are: Threatened, inevitable, missed abortion, complete abortion, incomplete abortion, septic.

Now types of induced abortion are: Therapeutic and non Therapeutic
Abortion laws in India.

This would be incorrect to say that abortion was illegal in India until the regulations through the MTP act came into force. Therapeutic abortions to save the mother’s life were always illegal. In India Medical Terminology of Pregnancy or induced abortion is permitted under sec. 312 of Indian Penal Code and Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act. Even after that 4 to 5 million abortions takes place annually in India, more than 2/3 (two-thirds) of them are illegal and performed outside the statutory provisions of the Medical Terminology of Pregnancy act by unskilled, untrained persons and are performed under highly unhygienic conditions. Under section 45 of Indian Penal Code, 1860, including abortion or causing “a women with a child to miscarry” is a criminal offence and punishable under IPC for both physician who does it or the women who procure it, there is only exception that when it is done in ‘good faith to save the life of a women’.

Women’s are also the prime part of the society for today and for the coming generations. They should be safe. The ICPD has mentioned in their report that women’s right to sexual health and reproduction as being the key to the women’s health. Every year thousands of women’s die due to unsafe abortion.
For insuring the safety of the women’s in the society Government has introduced various scheme’s for girls like national nutrition mission i.e. Poshan Abhiyan and Beti Bachao, Beti Padhao where its aim to save the girl child and educate her.


Constitutional Provisions
If we go through with the Constitution we will find that the framers of the Constitution had already enlisted Right to Health in the DPSP (Directive Principal of State Policy) which dictates that This is duty of the state of provide nutrition, rehabilitation, health services and general awareness and after that the judiciary plays a very vital role and it has been enforced as a Fundamental Right under Article 21 of the Constitution ( Right to Live with Human Dignity). The right to health also includes right to clean environment, right to food, reproductive rights, right to liberty, health and safety emergency health care etc. If any of these fundamental rights gets violate it can easily be taken to the court by filling a writ petition Supreme Court and High Court.


Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971
This medical termination of pregnancy act passed by the parliament in 1971 and this act came into force on April 1972. This act was amended in the year of 2002. In the act basically the conditions mentioned under which a pregnancy can be monitored, terminated and supervised by the Chief Medical Officer of the district. The medical termination of pregnancy act has enlarged the scope of legal abortion and this act also made safe abortion available to women up to 20 weeks of pregnancy under strict rules and regulations to ensure safety and prevent it’s misuse.


In the country, unwanted pregnancies also the main reason which set forth problems and which ultimately amount to fatal consequences to the women. In the country like India if the pregnancy is out of wedlock so considered disgraceful. After the MTP act,1971 passed it is legal now to have abortion in the country. Any women if she wants to or seeking an abortion is permissible under this law to do so. Despite several policies and laws, thousands of women dies every year due to this unsafe abortion process. This MTP act, 1971 consists of 8 sections dealing with various aspects like place, time and circumstances under which a pregnancy can be terminated or it may be terminated by a registered medical practitioner. The Medical termination of pregnancy act, 1971 has liberalized the availability of abortion by extending it when the pregnancy is going to cause grave physical or mental injury to the mother and by including rape- contraceptive and induced failure caused pregnancies.


Penal provisions Under sec 312 and 316 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 deal with penal provisions related to illegal abortion. These sections deal with offences related with unborn child and human body.
Sec 312 deal with if a person who knowingly causes a miscarriage to women with a child will be punished with imprisonment and fine for 3 years or both. It is a non cognizable and bailable offence.
Sec 316 is a cognizable, and non bailable under this section the offender does not necessarily cause abortion or does any thing which can kill the unborn baby, but according to this section even if there is no intention or desire by the offender still he/she liable or guilty for the offence.
Sec 316 deals with causing the death of an unborn baby by this act amounting to culpable homicide.

In the case of Suchita srivastava vs V krishnan 2, SC held that the state has the obligation or duty to ensure reproductive rights as component of her Fundamental Right article 21 that is personal liberty, dignity and privacy.

Conclusion
In the recent time the abortion method have become much safer. According to the several reports every year women suffer due to unwanted pregnancy specially in the rape victims cases. The Right to health if it does not promise better health to all the women it defeats its purpose and the government should understand and take the action’s for the same and launch the schemes related to health care. A women should have the proper right on her own body. Because of unsafe abortion it results in internal injury and infections which is because of the lack of proper awareness and knowledge. It is the duty of the society to make our women strong instead of making our women week so that they can fight back and do not lose hope.


Reference:

  1. https://www.drgandhali.com/p/20/types-of-abortion
  2. CIVIL APPEAL NO. 5845 of 2009 (arising out of S.L.P. © No. 17985 of 2009)

Articles

LEGAL RIGHTS OF ANIMALS AGAINST CRUELTY

Leave a comment

INTRODUCTION

Legal concepts of animal cruelty reflect the morality of our society regarding the rights of animals. These concepts especially expose dominant behavior towards animal exploitation. Omissions in the law that permit abusive animal treatment without legal penalty or threat to prosecution indicate the unquestioning support of such abuse by society. However though our community has acknowledged the need for laws on animal protection, animal welfare is usually not the main focus of these laws. Too often, the underlying reason for such legislation is a public interest in shielding property or avoiding malicious and suspicious activities. 

The terminology of anti-cruelty statutes, the implementation of such laws in court, and particular regulatory provisions resulting in the absence of legal prerequisites for practices such as animal laboratory experiments all lead to an obvious conclusion: animals may cherish some levels of immunity, but they do not have rights under the constitution. Unless the legislation acknowledges more than the human interests in avoiding the animal cruelty, animals would have no right to be safe from human inhibited pain and suffering.

HISTORY

The first scriptures of Hinduism, The Vedas (originating in the second millennium BCE), teach all living beings ahimsa or nonviolence. Killing an animal in Hinduism is considered a breach of the ahimsa and cause for lousy karma, which prompted many Hindus to adopt vegetarianism. However, Hindu principles do not require vegetarianism, and sometimes they sacrifice animals in sacred rituals and ceremonies. 

India’s first National Animal Welfare Act, the Prevention of Cruelty to Animal Act or the PCA Act (1960), forbids animal cruelty, with exceptions to animal treatment for medicinal or experimental purposes. Consequent legislation has imposed controls and limitations on the use of domestic animals, livestock transport, animal slaughter, animal experimentation, and performing animals’ employment. General requirements for breeding and usage of animals for research have been set by The Breeding of and Experiments on Animals (Control and Supervision) Rules, 1998. According to the amendment of 2006, animals “lowest on the phylogenetic scale” must be used for experiments. 95% statistical assurance in using the minimum number of animal species and justification should be given for not using non-animal substitutes. The use of living animals in medical education experiments is banned by amendment of 2013. In 2014, a ban was imposed on all cosmetic testing done on animals, and the import of animal-tested cosmetics products, with this India, became the 1st country in Asia to bring out such change. 

HOW THE LEGAL RIGHTS OF ANIMALS AGAINST CRUELTY ARE PROPOUNDED?

Animal cruelty is wilful harming, abusing, and neglecting an animal. It is subjecting any animal to cruel mistreatment. Some forms of animal cruelty consist of deliberately placing animals in conditions that harm them, frighten them, and terrorize them.

A precedent was released in 2014 by the Supreme Court of India. It extended the shield of Article 21 of the constitution of India, which safeguards human life and liberty, to all animals. The court said, “Having an inalienable right to live in a safe and clean environment, not to be battered, kicked, bitten, tortured, pried by humans with alcohol or forced to stand in small enclosures amid bellows and crowd groans.”

SOME LEGAL RIGHTS

  1. Article 51A (g) of the Constitution of India: It is the fundamental duty of every citizen of India to have compassion for all living creatures.
  2. IPC Sections 428 and 429: To kill or maim any animal, including stray animals, is a punishable offense. 

3. Section 11(1) (i) and Section 11(1) (j), PCA Act, 1960: Abandoning any animal for any reason can land you in prison for up to three months. 

4. Rule 3, of PCA Act (slaughterhouse rules) 2001 and Ch.4 Food Safety and Standards Regulations, 2011: No animal (including chickens) can be slaughtered in any place other than a slaughterhouse. Sick or pregnant animals shall not be slaughtered. 

5. ABC Rules, 2001: Stray dogs operated for birth control cannot be captured or relocated by anybody, including any authority. 

6. Section 11(1) (h), PCA Act, 1960: Neglecting an animal by denying her sufficient food, water, shelter, and exercise or keeping him chained/confined for long hours is punishable by a fine or imprisonment of up to 3 months or both.

7. Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972: Monkeys are protected and cannot be displayed or owned.

8. Section 22(ii), PCA Act, 1960: Bears, monkeys, tigers, panthers, lions, and bulls are prohibited from being trained and used for entertainment purposes, either in circuses or streets.

9. Rule 3, Slaughterhouse Rules, 2001: Animal sacrifice is illegal in every part of the country. 

10. Section 11(1) (m) (ii) and Section 11(1) (n), PCA Act, 1960: Organizing of or participating in or inciting any animal fight is a cognizable offense. 

11. Rules 148-C and 135-B of Drugs & Cosmetics Rules, 1945: Cosmetics tested on animals and the import of cosmetics tested on animals is banned. 

12. Section 38(J), Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972:Teasing, feeding or disturbing the zoo and littering the zoo premises is an offense punishable by a fine of Rs. 25000 or imprisonment of up to three years or both. 

13. Section 9, Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972: Capturing, trapping, poisoning or baiting of any wild animal or even attempting to do and disturbing or destroying eggs or nests of birds and reptiles or chopping a tree having nests of such birds and reptiles or even trying to do so constitutes to hunting so is punishable by law, with a fine of up to Rs. 25000 or imprisonment of up to seven years or both. 

14. Section 11(1) (d) Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, (Transport of Animal) Rules, 2001 and Motor Vehicles Act 1978: Displaying or carrying animals, either in or on a vehicle, in any manner or position that causes discomfort, pain or distress, is a punishable offense under the two Central Government Acts.

CONCLUSION

The claim that animals are not supposed to be mistreated relies upon the same moral values, which offer human beings several fundamental rights. There is not merely a utilitarian criterion for respecting those rights. For example, we don’t accept slavery, even though slaves as oppressed persons can not confront people holding rights. It would be safer, at least economically, to keep slaves in the field according to a utilitarian viewpoint. This gross inequality is reprehensible, and the law acknowledges it. Animals, however, are not humans. There are also absurd associations between the exploited people and animals. Today, the notion that animals should have civil rights seems progressive and radical. Therefore, the law in all fields importantly takes an active part in encouraging animal rights.

REFERENCES

https://www.strawindia.org/laws-that-protect-animals-in-india.aspx

https://www.peta.org/issues/animal-companion-issues/animal-companion-factsheets/animal-abuse-human-abuse-partners-crime

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Animal_welfare_and_rights_in_India

Author:

Harshita Gupta

Fairfield Institute of Management and Technology

Articles

2030 Sustainable Development Agendas

Leave a comment

This article is written by Abhishek Yadav, Maharaja Agrasen Institute of Management Studies, Rohini

Abstract

This 2030 sustainable development agenda is just the goals which need to be fulfilled before the date and these goals are in the favour of the peace and prosperity for the people and for this planet.

Introduction

According to sustainable development commission “sustainable development is the development that meets the needs of the present, without compromising the ability of future generations to satisfy their own needs”.1
Development is the necessity of this point of time and sustainable development is just about to find better ways of doing things both for the present and future generations. The way we are doing things and living now we might need to change this way for the better present and future. But this doesn’t mean that the quality of people’s life will be reduced. And this sustainable development does not only about the environment or simply target environmental issues but every other natural resource like ensuring healthy, strong and just society. This means every need of all people in present moreover as for those in who is in future, promoting social cohesion, personal well being and inclusion and creating equal opportunity.


Is sustainable development only focuses on the future?

No, sustainable development does not only focuses on future but sustainable development is something to find a way to utilize the resources in present but not compromising the needs of future generations.
A sustainable development way can change and produce many benefits briefly term and in the future period, for example:
Transport and health: rather than buying your own car and driving, switching to walking and cycling or using the general public transport for the short journey will save your money, improve the health and make the environment healthy.
Environment-friendly House’s: not just building the homes which will harm the environment but to make the house visible of the environment so that can not harm this or longer-term generations.
Stick with the environmental limits is our one in all central principals of sustainable development and not following the identical will cause global climate change.2

17 sustainable development goals


The 17 SDGs with there 169 target’s from the core of 2030 agenda. They balance the social, economic and ecological dimensions of sustainable development and that they fight against the poverty, and sustainable development on the identical agenda for the primary time.


Overview of the 17 sustainable development agenda’s


 End poverty all told its forms from everywhere
 Achieve food security, end hunger and promote sustainable agriculture.
 Ensure healthy lives and promote well – being for all in any respect ages.
 Ensure inclusive and equitable quality education and promote lifelong learning opportunity for all
 Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls
 Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all
 Ensure access to affordable, reliable, sustainable and modern energy for all
 Promote sustained, inclusive and sustainable economic process, full and productive employment and decent work for all
 Build resilient infrastructure, promote inclusive and sustainable industrialization and foster innovation
 Reduce inequality within and among countries.
 Make cities and human settlement inclusive, safe resilient and sustainable.
 Ensure sustainable consumption and production patterns.
 Take urgent action to combat global climate change and it’s impacts
 Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas, and marine resources for sustainable development
 Protect, promote and restore sustainable use of terrestrial ecosystems, sustainably manage Forest’s combat desertification, and halt and reserve land
 Promote peaceful and inclusive societies for sustainable development, provide access to justice for all
 Strengthen the means of implementation and revitalize the worldwide partnership for sustainable development.3

A decade of actions

Only ten years left to achieve the set sustainable development goals so, for that world leaders at the sustainable development summit in 2019 needed for a decade of actions and delivery of the goals of sustainable development, and pledge to boost national implementation, mobilize financing and strengthen institutions to realize the goals by 2030, and leaving nobody behind.
The UN Secretary-General divided this decade of action in three levels global action, local action, and people action.

These are basically those goals which can bring peace and prosperity for the people of the planet and There are those goals as well which is basically for saving the planet for the coming to a generation so that they do not face any difficulty in there life because of the extreme misuse of the natural resources and other issue’s that pollutes the planet. And there are a variety of tools exist to check and visualize progress towards the goals.

  • Global action just to secure the greater leadership, smarter solution and more resources for sustainable development agenda.
  • Local action is for embedding the needed transitions in policies, institution’s, budgets and regulatory frameworks of the presidency.
  • People action is simply to include the youth, the media, civil society, unions, private sector and stakeholders, just to get the unstoppable movement that needs for the transformation.4
    The agenda of sustainable development 2030 is adopted by all the United Nation’s member states in the year 2015 and the agenda provides a blueprint for prosperity and peace for the people and for this planet, for now, and into the future. And this sustainable development agenda basically has 17 goals which are an urgent call for action by all the countries whether it is developed or developing countries. All the 17 goals have a list of which are measured by indicators.5

Conclusion
The agenda is very clear that using the resources in a way that can help the present generation but without going to affect the coming generation. And in this 2030 sustainable development agenda, it’s not only about the resources but it is about the other aspect’s as well there are basically 17 goals which need to be fulfilled before 2030 it included goals like zero hunger, no poverty, gender equality, quality education, clean water and sanitation, affordable and clean energy, reducing inequality, climate action’s, life below water, life on land etc.

Reference:

  1. http://www.sd-commission.org.uk/pages/what-is-sustainable-development.html
  2. https://www.worldbank.org/en/programs/sdgs-2030-agenda
  3. https://www.eda.admin.ch/agenda2030/en/home/agenda-2030/die-17-ziele-fuer-eine-nachhaltige-entwicklung.html
  4. https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/development-agenda/
  5. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sustainable_Development_Goals

Articles

CLASSIFICATION OF COMPANY SECURITIES

Leave a comment

This article is written by Abhishek Yadav, Maharaja Agrasen Institute of Management Studies, Rohini

This article basically deals with the topic of classification of corporate securities which includes the definition of securities according to the security contract act, 1956 and their various types.


WHAT IS SECURITIES?
Security, in business economics, written evidence of ownership conferring the right to receive property not currently in possession of the holder. The most common types of securities are stocks and bonds, of which there are many particular kinds designed to meet specialized needs. If we talk about kinds of securities, then there are various types of securities available other than stocks and bonds Basically Securities allude to an investment that can be unreservedly traded in the market and gives a privilege or guarantee on an asset and all future cash flows produced by that asset.


ACCORDING TO SECTION 2(H) OF SECURITIES CONTRACT (REGULATION) ACT, 1956 :
SECURITIES INCLUDE – shares, scrip’s, stocks, bonds, debentures, debenture stock or other marketable securities of a like nature in or of any incorporated company or other body corporate.


CLASSIFICATION OF SECURITIES
Securities can be divided into government securities and corporate securities on the basis of source of the issue.


CLASSIFICATION OF COMPANY SECURITIES
CORPORATE SECURITIES
Organizations issue various kinds of shares to clean up assets from different investors. Before Companies Act, 1956 public companies used to give three sorts of shares, for example, Preference Shares, Ordinary Shares and Deferred Shares. The Companies Act, 1956 has restricted the kind of shares to just two-Preference share and Equity Shares.


EQUITY SHARE
Equity shares, otherwise called ordinary shares or common shares speak to the proprietors’ capital in an organization. The holders of these shares are the genuine proprietors of the organization. They have a command over the working of the organization. Equity shareholders are delivered a profit in the wake of paying it to the preference shareholders. The pace of profit on these shares relies on the benefits of the organization.


PREFERENCE SHARES
As the name proposes, these shares have certain preferences when contrasted with a different type of shares. These shares are given two preferences. There is a preference for the instalment of profit. At whatever point the organization has distributable benefits, the profit is first paid on preference share capital.
Different investors are delivered dividend just out of the rest of the benefits, assuming any. The second preference for these shares is the reimbursement of capital at the hour of liquidation of the organization. In the wake of paying outside loan bosses, preference share capital is returned. Equity shareholders will be covered just when preference share capital is returned.


DEFERRED SHARES
These shares were prior given to promoters or founders for administrations rendered to the organization. These offers were known as Founders Shares since they were ordinarily given to founders. These shares rank last so far as an instalment of dividend and return of capital is concerned. Preference shares and equity shares have needed as to instalment of dividend.
These shares were by and large of a little division and the administration of the organization stayed in their grasp by temperance of their voting rights. These shareholders attempted to deal with the organization with proficiency and economy since they got dividend just finally.


NO PAR STOCK/SHARES
No par stock methods shares having no assumed worth. The capital of an organization giving such shares is partitioned into various determined shares with no particular category. The share endorsement of the organization basically expresses the number of shares held by its proprietor without referencing any presumptive worth.

The estimation of an share can be controlled by partitioning the genuine total assets of the organization with the absolute number of shares of the organization. Dividend on such shares is paid per share and not as a level of fixed ostensible estimation of shares.


SHARES WITH DIFFERENTIAL RIGHTS
“Shares with differential rights” means that shares issued with differential rights in accordance with section 86 of the Companies Act.
Section 86 of the companies Act, as amended by the Companies (Amendment) Act, 2000, provides that the new issue of the share capital of a company limited by shares basically of two kinds namely:


EQUITY SHARE CAPITAL
With voting rights,
With differential rights as to dividend, casting a ballot or in any case as per such rules and subject to such conditions as might be recommended.


PREFERENCE SHARE CAPITAL
Sub-clauses (i) and (ii) in clause (a) above were inserted by the Companies (Amendment) Act, 2000 which came into effect on 13th December 2000.
Subsequently, section 88 of the Companies Act was precluded which restricted issue of equity shares to unbalanced rights.
Nonetheless, it must be noticed that the issue of shares with differential rights as allowed by the Companies (Amendment) Act, 2000 is associated with equity shares just and not the preference shares.


SWEAT EQUITY
The term ‘sweat equity’ signifies equity shares gave by an organization to its employees or chiefs at a markdown or for thought other than money for giving ability or making accessible rights in the idea of intellectual property rights (state, patent or copyright) or worth increments, by whatever name called.

The thought behind the issue of sweat equity is that a representative or executive works best when he has ‘feeling of belongingness’ and is plentifully remunerated.

One of the methods of rewarding him is by offering him portions of the organization at low costs, where he is working. It is named as ‘sweat equity’ as it is earned by difficult work (sweat) of employees and it is likewise alluded to as ‘sweat equity’ as employees become upbeat on the issue of such offers. The reason for sweat equity is to guarantee more dedication and support of employees.

DEBENTURES OR BONDS
An organization may raise long haul account through public borrowings. These advances are raised by the issue of debentures. A debenture is an affirmation of a debt. As per Thomas Evelyn.

“A debenture is a record under the organization’s seal which accommodates the instalment of a chief entirety and intrigue subsequently at ordinary interims, which is generally made sure about by a fixed or drifting charge on the organization’s property or undertaking and which recognizes a credit to the organization’s property or undertaking and which recognizes an advance to the organization”.

A debenture-holder is a loan boss of the organization. A fixed pace of intrigue is paid on debentures. The interest on debentures is a charge on the benefit and misfortune record of the organization. The debentures are commonly given a drifting charge over the benefits of the organization. At the point when the debentures are made sure about, they are paid on need in contrast with every single other creditor.


CONCLUSION
These are the types of securities of the government securities and corporate securities. As we have already understood that Government securities are bonds and securities given by the government towards meeting their budgetary shortages. These securities are considered as perhaps the most secure type of investment as sovereign assurances back these. Investors can purchase and offer these securities to procure capital gains and appreciate a steady premium instalment on the presumptive worth of their investment. On the other hand, the corporate securities can be as the- debentures, shares, loans from institution’s, public deposits. And all these for the purpose of making fixed capital, joint-stock organizations mobilize funds from the public in the form of ordinary or equity share or preference shares.

Articles

THE NEED OF A STRICT POPULATION CONTROL LAW

Leave a comment

To get daily updates, Join Team Attorneylex’s WhatsApp group. 

Also, check us out on Instagram and Twitter

This article is written by Abhishek Yadav, Maharaja Agrasen Institute of Management Studies, Rohini

Introduction: Controlling a population, shaping the future
One of the major issues in the world is population nowadays because the population is increasing day by day and the sources are limited for living. For creating the awareness about this population issue we celebrate Population day every year on the 11th of July. Population growth in the world directly triggers higher demand for provision of various aspect of Human existence including housing, healthcare, food, infrastructure, jobs access to resources and many other issues. Controlling the population and their sustainability is vital in the health of a country’s economy.
There is not a set pattern to solve this issue either in developed or in developing counties. One of the best way to aware the people about that the population growth is just by giving the education to them about this population problem like to getting them to know that if the world becomes overpopulated so no one can get a better life and everyone going to face the difficulty to getting the better education, healthcare, and future job opportunities etc. (1)
People are more aware in the developed countries in comparison to the developing countries about the family size and population growth issue, the people who are in developing countries there traditional perception about children as important capital for a family are still prevalent.
Need to control the population
If we talk about India so population growth is a major issue in the country right now, PM Narendra Modi in his Independence Day speech called for deeper thought about this issue. PM said that this population explosion can create new problems for future generations. However, the government is doing there best to aware the citizen of the country about this issue. (2)
The population is a big concern even the growth rates are declining recent estimates and statistics are showing slightly positive picture about India. But still, this is a major issue because of social and economic reasons. According to the ‘world population report, 2019’ India will overtake China in less than a decade but the news projections for India are the lowest since the UN began these forecasts. The reason is the sharp decline in India’s population growth rates over 10 years from 2001 to 2011. According to Census 2011, the growth rate of population has declined from 21.5% during 1991-2001 to 17.7% during 2001-2011, across all religious groups.(3)


Why do we need strict population control law
A country can only survive and grow when their population is in control because the sources are limited to fulfil the need of everyone. According to many of eminent personality in the recent time, we need a strict law to control the population problem and even the government is also aware of this issue that how much we need a strict law to tackle this issue according to Sanjeev Balyan (Union Minister, Govt. Of India) “Population explosion is the reason for most problems we are facing in this country. Pollution, poverty, and lack of sanitation facilities are all related to the high population and ‘Bharat Mata’ cannot bear this burden anymore.”(4)

And the government has presented their population control bill, 2019 in Rajya sabha once and there are doing everything to control the population in the county. World’s Population as of Now: as per the UN population division the current population of the world is 7.8 billion and the five most populous countries are as follows:


1 China 1,415,046,928
2 India 1,354,051,764
3 United States 326,766,948
4 Indonesia 266,894,980
5 Brazil 210,867,954
In a country like India where the sources are limited to fulfil the need of everyone and the citizen’s of the country are not that educated or aware about the issue like population control and they believe in the traditional values about there children’s especially the boy, so because of all this, it becomes the duty of the government to aware the citizens of the country about the population problem and they also need to make the strict laws related to population control so that it can help in controlling the population.


Conclusion
The world is facing the population issue especially the countries like China and India and other developing countries because of the lack of education, lack of awareness and because of there tradition values more than half of the world population is living in 2 countries(China and India) but China has made some controversial decisions to control the population like the one-child policy but in India, there is not such any law to control this issue and because of this the population is rising rapidly. This is time that we need to think and take actions related to this issue and make some strict laws and aware of the citizens.
Recently the government of Assam made a public controversial draft population policy. Under the policy, those with more than two children will not be able to get the government jobs or avail benefits like government housing contest local body elections.(5)
Overpopulation will give us nothing but just the problems because the natural sources are limited and this mother earth is not able to bear our weight anymore and becomes incapable now so, this is the time to do something to control this population problem not only in one country but in the whole world.

Abstract: The world is currently facing the population issue and they need to take the actions against it make some strict laws to control this issue other this can harm everyone.

Reference
Articles

MEDIATION A TOOL FOR ACCESS TO JUSTICE

Leave a comment

This article deals with the topic of mediation which is a part of ADR. This article basically talks about the importance of mediation and how it is important in these times.


INTRODUCTION

ADR i.e. alternative Dispute Resolution as it very well may be effectively comprehended by the words that ADR is an alternative technique to resolve disputes now first we need to comprehend that what is the conventional method that is “court”. In India, as we all know there are plenty of cases pending and courts can’t resolve all the cases and the Indian judiciary is inefficient to manage the pending cases. The administration knows about this reality and that is the reason the legislature has supported for setting up in excess of a thousand fast track courts and these courts help a ton to break up and settle a large number of cases. Be that as it may, much after that the number of pending cases is expanding day by day.

To manage this sort of circumstance ADR can assume an extremely indispensable job. ADR can resolve the dispute swiftly and the decision that gets through this ADR is acknowledged by both the parties. ADR is generally acknowledged on the grounds that it settle the dispute in practice a wide range of issues like a commercial, civil, family and industrial issues, and so on.1

RELATION OF ADR WITH CONSTITUTION AND OTHER ACTS.

At the point when we talk about ADR in the Indian situation so ADR in India was founded on the Constitutional article 14 right to equality and Article 21 right to life and personal liberty. Article 39 A, DPSPs, are likewise included in the ADR for giving justice and free legal aid, Furthermore, when we talk about explicit acts that are connected with ADR so for the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 and legal services authority act 1987 is there. Section 89 of CPC 1908 likewise discusses the alternative method, this section gives that opportunity to the individuals, in the event that it seems to court there exists a component of settlement outside the courts at that point court figure the particulars of a potential settlement and allude the equivalent for arbitration, conciliation, mediation and Lok Adalat.


WHY ADR IS THE NEED OF THE TIME?

Since this procedure is quick thusly less time-consuming in contrast with conventional court procedures. Less expensive than litigation and saves money as well. It is adaptable and liberated from the technicalities of courts and individuals can resolve their disputes without any problem. It is a nonbinding procedure with the exception of from few methods people are allowed to express and they can reveal the true facts identified with the case.


TYPES OF ADR

  • Arbitration
  • Conciliation
  • Negotiation
  • Mediation
  • Lok Adalat

WHAT IS THE SIGNIFICANCE OF ACCESS TO JUSTICE?

In 1999 the then chief justice of the family court Alastair Nicholson, and sue lynch wrote: “any conversation of access to Justice should be set inside a more extensive setting than that of the legal framework alone and in the time of 2009 the access to the justice task force in the commonwealth attorney, journals dept. Published ‘ a key structure for access to justice in the federal civil justice framework. Access to justice is key to the standard of law and basic to the enjoyment regarding fundamental human rights, it is a basic precondition to social incorporation and a basic component of a well-working majority rule government. An effective justice system must be available in the entirety of its parts without this, the framework dangers losing its significance to, and the regard of the network it serves availability is about more than straightforward entry to land stone structure or getting legal advice. While courts are a significant part of the justice system, there are numerous circumstances courts are the last spot individuals will get the result they are searching for to determine issues.

The basic test is whether our justice system is simple, reasonable, and affordable. It is additionally significant that the framework gives viable early mediation to assist individuals with settling issues before they raise and lead to digging in a disservice.

An alternative mechanism to improve value and access to justice and accomplish lower cast civil dispute resolution, in both metropolitan regions and provincial and remote communities and the expense and advantages of these.

Where parties can’t arrive at a private resolution, the civil justice system gives them different approaches to determine the dispute and mediation is one of the ways.


WHAT IS MEDIATION?

Mediation is one of the methods of alternative dispute resolution(ADR) accessible to parties. Mediation is basically a negotiation encouraged by an impartial third party. Unlike arbitration, which is a procedure of ADR fairly like a trial, mediation doesn’t include decisions by the impartial third party. ADR techniques can be started by the parties or might be constrained by enactment, the courts, or legally binding terms.


IS MEDIATION RIGHT FOR YOU?

At the point when pieties are reluctant or unable to resolve a dispute, one great option is to go to mediation. Mediation is commonly a short term, structured, task-situated, and “hands-on” process.

In meditation, the disputing parties work with an unbiased third party, the mediator, to determine their disputes. The mediator encourages the resolution of the parties’ disputes by regulating the exchange of information and the haggling procedure. The mediator enables the parties to discover shared opinions and manage unrealistic desires. The individual may likewise offer inventive arrangements and help with drafting a final assessment. The role of the mediator is to decipher concerns, transfer information between the parties, outline issues, and characterize the issues.


WHEN TO MEDIATE

Mediation is generally a voluntary procedure, albeit now and again resolutions, rules, or court orders may require participation in mediation. Mediation is regular in small claims courts, housing courts, family courts, and some criminal court projects and neighbourhood justice system.

Dissimilar to the litigation procedure, where a nonpartisan third party (normally a judge) imposes a decision over the issue, the parties and their mediator commonly control the mediation process – choosing when and where the mediation happens, who will be present, how the mediation will be paid for, and how the mediator will interface with the parties.


WHAT IS THE ROLE OF THE MEDIATOR

Every time the last decision is taken by the parties and the mediator doesn’t decide anything and he has no power to decide the dispute between the parties and essentially put he is the guardian of the procedure and he can’t give his recommendation gave it is evaluative mediation. Be that as it may, what does the mediator do is he simply offer his input and attempt to come to a conclusion which is generally of the parties by their own points.


PROCEDURE

  • Opening statement
  • Joint session
  • Separate session
  • Closing

In the opening statement, the mediator just gives all the information about his appointment and he proclaims that he is an unbiased individual and he has no interest in the subject matter. In the joint session, the mediator attempts to comprehend the facts and the issues of the case and he assembles each data identified with the dispute by welcoming both the parties and parties present their case and give their point of view looking into the case.

In the separate session fundamentally mediator accumulates information by taking both the parties in confidence separately and he attempts to comprehend the core of the dispute. In the wake of hearing both the parties and when he comprehends the entire dispute, he attempts to make alternatives for settlement through parties on the statement, facts which are given by the parties subsequent to being asked by the mediator.

Mediation is not quite the same as conciliation as conciliation is the formulation of opinion and conveyance of verdict. Be that as it may, in mediation, a mediator is just a facilitator and just render his opinion in the dispute and he can convey his verdict with respect to the contest anyway the conciliator plays more interventionist role and make a proposition for the dispute and this was decided in the case of Salem Advocate Bar Association v. U.O.I; in this case, SC held that mediator is merely a facilitator while the conciliator by making proposals for a settlement of the dispute and by reformulation the conditions of the settlement assume a progressively dynamic the mediation is the procedure of structured negotiation including various stages like a joint session, introduction, separate session and so on.


HOW IT IS A TOOL FOR ACCESS TO JUSTICE

As we already understood that what is the significance of access to justice and how it is related to ADR now let’s try to understand how it is a tool for access to Justice.

At the point when parties can’t arrive at a private resolution then the civil justice system gives them different approaches to determine the contest mediation at that point turns into the most embraced structure for this since it is the nonbinding decision by the mediator. Parties can without much of a stretch access the Justice through their own particular manner by giving the fact to the mediator and thus resolve the dispute, access to Justice implies the capacity to get Justice by any individual and the most ordinary method for getting justice is through a court of law yet nowadays courts are overburdened by loads of cases at the principal example court alludes the parties to determine the dispute through mediation.

As has just been expressed that a mediator is a nonpartisan third party that goes about as a guardian of the procedure without mediating in the topic makes it a method for settling disputes agreeably and it additionally is a swift and adaptable method for resolving disputes with sets aside both money and time. Since mediation isn’t a procedure to be recorded for the public record their for it likewise spares the generosity of the parties from being discoloured. Every one of these highlights of mediation makes it the fittest method for resolving disputes between parties in today’s time when the courts are troubled with cases.


CONCLUSION

Mediation is one of a few ways to deal with resolving disputes It contrasts from the antagonistic resolution process by temperance of its simplicity, familiarity, flexibility, and economy. Mediation gives the chance to parties to concur terms and resolve issues without anyone else, without the requirement for legal representation or court hearings.

Why mediation is important and how it is a tool for access to justice, following are some of the benefits which typically associated with mediation.

  • Recognition
  • Empowerment
  • Speedy trial
  • Economical
  • Confidentiality
  • Quality of settlement
  • Avoid bad outcomes


The prior is only a portion of the convincing reasons to mediate disputes. Besides, there is only here and there any genuine drawback to mediation. While some may hesitate “to lay it all out there” in mediation, in this period of disclosure driven litigation, the old “trial by ambush” long stretches of civil litigation are progressively turning into a relic of times gone by. Mediation works not just on the grounds that it centres around the parties, own interests, and agendas. yet in addition since it gives the chance to parties to move beyond dispute proficiently and graph their own future.

Articles

DATA PRIVACY IN REFERENCE WITH AROGYA SETU APP

Leave a comment


The application – Aarogya Setu, which signifies “bridge to health” in Sanskrit – was launched only a month and a half ago.
India has made it compulsory for government and private part employees to download it.
However, users and experts in India and around the globe state the application raise colossal data security concerns.


Aarogya Setu stores location information and requires consistent access to the mobile Bluetooth which, experts state, makes it obtrusive from a security and privacy perspective.
In Singapore, for instance, the TraceTogether application can be utilized solely by its health ministry to get to the information. It guarantees peoples that the information is to be utilized carefully for disease control and won’t be imparted to the law enforcement agencies for implementing lockdowns and quarantine.

“Aarogya Setu holds the adaptability to do only that, or to guarantee consistency of lawful requests, etc,” says the Internet Freedom Foundation, a digital rights and liberties advocacy group in Delhi.

Concerns have also been raised over how much data the app collects. It asks its users to share their name, phone number, age, gender, profession, and details of countries visited in the last 30 days.
In addition, it asks users to self-assess for any possible COVID-19 symptoms and enter that data daily. The app shows users how many people have symptoms in a particular radius, and how many have tested positive. It sends alerts when a new person near you tests positive, or if someone who was near you previously tests positive.


India has no national data privacy law, and it’s not clear who has access to data from the app and in what situations,” researchers at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) have said in a review. The team at MIT ranks various COVID tracing tracker apps around the world for their transparency and other factors, and Aarogya Setu met just two of its five criteria.

There are no strong, transparent policy or design limitations on accessing or using the data at this point,” the researchers say while noting that India is the “only democracy making its app mandatory for millions of people.


Some fear India’s app could be used in a way that would violate civil liberties, including by helping to build a state surveillance system that could be exploited after the app outlives its coronavirus-tracking purpose.

The government, meanwhile, is considering expanding the mandate for the app. It already covers all train travellers, and it may also apply to air passengers once the world’s biggest COVID-lockdown lifts and flights resume.

Violation of the law laid down by the Supreme Court– It is important to note that the Aarogya Setu app has been launched in the time of an ongoing pandemic, when the Governments are trying to maximise data collection, often at the cost of privacy rights of citizens. India does not have a law dealing with personal data protection which should be limiting data collection and processing. SFLC.IN, along with a coalition of lawyers, social activists, entrepreneurs, and concerned citizens, had recently sent a joint letter to various ministries of the Central Government and also the heads of states and union territories expressing concerns over the unwarranted and excessive collection of personal data during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic urging the various governments to follow law enunciated in various Supreme Court judgments. If you haven’t signed on the campaign letter.


“Aarogya Setu” is not open source – Though the Central Government has a prevailing policy on adoption of open source software the Aarogya Setu app’s code has not been made open source. Making the source code available enhances transparency and this also improves security as the code is open to community audit. The app primarily collects personal data from user cellphones and cellphones are an immense repository of personal data of users and sometimes, of a user’s contacts and acquaintances. In this scenario, keeping the source code of such an app proprietary is not advisable.

Articles

PARLIAMENTARY SOVEREIGNTY

Leave a comment

Meanings of Parliamentary Sovereignty: According to Prof. AV Dicey in his book, An Introduction to the Study of the Constitution, which was distributed in 1885, characterized the term as the privilege of Parliament to cause a to unmake any law whatever; and further that the law of England perceives no individual or body as reserving an option to revoke or put aside the enactment of Parliament.

Throughout the year’s specialists have contended for the cutoff points on parliamentary sovereignty to be perceived and that courts ought not to guard statues that attack democracy, the rule of law, and civil liberties. This pattern of contending for cutoff points to parliamentary sovereignty had now gotten judicial acknowledgement in R (Jackson) v A G 2005 Lords (upholding the Hunting Act 2004) when Lord Hope said ‘Parliamentary sovereignty is an unfilled guideline if legislation is passed which is so ludicrous or so unsatisfactory that the individuals everywhere decline to remember it as law.’ The essential issue here is ensuring civil liberties and upholding the standard of the law.

The history behind this concept

The UK constitution is frequently depicted as an ‘unwritten constitution,’ yet it is best portrayed as ‘partly written and entirely uncodified’ (Budge et al., 1998). The principal source being the statues, laws established by the parliament, thus giving the parliament the supreme capacity to make and unmake laws in the entire UK. For instance, in 1984, the Government prohibited the Government Communications Headquarters (GCHQ) worker’s guild dependent on unsound contentions, which were in the end switched by the approaching Government in 1997. Dicey (1964) considered parliamentary sovereignty as the essential protected head and all else subordinate to this head. The primary dispute of Dicey’s principle is that in constitutional democracy based system, force ought not to be total, and it ought to be controlled. The central question is under what conditions can courts address or modifies an act of parliament.

Is Indian parliament sovereign ?

In March 1975, Indira Gandhi, the then PM with a large dominant party in Parliament, endured a thrashing in the courts. Rather than complying with a mellow choice of the court (‘avoid casting a ballot in the Lok Sabha’), she forced Emergency, marked into law by then-president Fakhruddin Ali Ahmed. The beautiful thing about the Emergency was that it was constitutional. It isn’t ‘We the People’ who rule India. It is the chosen dominant party going about as the Executive.

What are the factors which limit the sovereignty of the Indian parliament?

Those factors are mentioned below:

Written nature the Constitution
The Constitution is the fundamental law that must be adhered to in our nation. Parliament needs to work inside the cutoff points endorsed by the Constitution.

Federal system of government
India has a federal system of government with a constitutional division of forces between the Union and the states. Both need to work inside the circles allocated to them. Subsequently, the law-making authority of the Parliament gets kept to the subjects identified in the Union List and Concurrent List.

System of judicial review
The reception of an autonomous Judiciary with the intensity of judicial review likewise limits the matchless quality of our Parliament. Both the Supreme Court and High Courts can proclaim the laws sanctioned by the Parliament as void and ultra vires.

Fundamental rights
The authority of the Parliament is likewise limited by the joining of a code of fundamental judicial rights under Part III of the Constitution. Article 13 precludes the State from making a law that either removes absolutely or repeals to some degree a fundamental right. Subsequently, a Parliamentary law that repudiates the fundamental rights will be void.

In certain nations, parliamentary sovereignty might be stood out from separation of powers, which constrains the governing body’s extension regularly to general law-production, and judicial review, where laws passed by the lawmaking body might be pronounced invalid in specific conditions.
Many states have sovereign legislatures, including the United Kingdom, Finland, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Sweden, Norway, Denmark, Iceland, Barbados, Jamaica, Papua New Guinea, Israel, and the Solomon Islands.

Parliamentary sovereignty is basically the need that parliament has over other law-making bodies. Fundamentally, parliament can’t settle on any choices that would tie future parliaments. This basically expels the opportunity of having a codified constitution as this would require the evacuation of parliamentary sovereignty before a written constitution could become revered into British law. The idea of sovereignty returns a few centuries; until 1689, it was the monarch who held a definitive force. This was changed to give parliament the top political and law-making rule, in spite of the fact that the monarch is still intensely included.
The idea of parliamentary sovereignty is generally viewed as the focal idea for the British constitution. Basically, parliamentary sovereignty perceives the possibility that parliament is the preeminent law-making body inside the UK. Not at all like different nations, for example, the USA or Germany, the UK doesn’t have one single content for its constitution and is un-classified. This doesn’t be that as it may diminish its focal significance to the UK constitutional procedures.

Parliamentary sovereignty has been the essential foundation of established law in the UK for a few centuries. In spite of this, ongoing occasions identifying with joining the European Union have restricted the preeminent force that parliament had by dissolving two of the principal factors alluded to by Dicey. Initially, the legal executive has a substantially more political job by ideals of the Human Rights Act 1998, therefore permitting it to challenge the decisions of parliament; and furthermore, there is currently a higher assemblage of law that has a direct impact on the UK. Both of these elements have acted to restrict, however not expel, the customary idea of parliamentary sovereignty.
The human rights ramifications of leaving the EU are significant. With neither a justiciable bill of rights nor the coupling idea of EU rights, Parliament remains the last overseer of human rights in the UK. The Supreme Court in Miller, a long way from applying the intensity of a delegated legal executive, in actuality reasserted the major equitable standard of government through representative Parliament.

Articles

MEDIA TRIAL

Leave a comment

Whenever a sensational criminal case comes to be tried before the court, there is an expected upsurge in the public curiosity. Using the thirst for sensational news, Media, including TV Channels, Newspapers, News Websites etc. start publishing their own version of the facts. They call it investigative journalism, which is not prohibited in India. The impact of television and newspaper coverage on an individual’s reputation by creating a widespread perception of guilt or innocence even before a court of law has announced its verdict, is called “Media Trial” or “Trial by media”.

Legal Provisions pertaining to Media Trial

Following legal and constitutional provisions:

Freedom of Expression

The Freedom of Expression has been enshrined in Article 19(1) of the constitution. This article is one of the important facilitators for widespread media engagement in democracy. On the other hand, Article 19(2) empowers the state to put reasonable restrictions on the freedom given by Article 19(1).

Right to Life and Liberty / Right to Privacy / RTI

The media trial has been alleged to violate the Fundamental Right secured by Article 21 (right to life and liberty) of an individual. Right to Privacy has been recognized as a right “implicit in the right to life and liberty guaranteed to the citizens of this country by Article 21. However, the law of the land has made some exceptions to the rule of privacy in the interest of the public, especially, subsequent to the enactment of the Right to Information Act, 2005 (RTI).

During media trials, not only the suspects and accused but also the victims suffer from excessive publicity and invasion of their privacy rights. When the media unilaterally conducts a sting operation, it violates the privacy of another person and makes it liable for legal action. The right to privacy of an individual should be protected unless there is an identifiable large public interest.

Under the RTI act is also an exception under section 8 (1) (j), which exempts disclosure of any personal information which is not connected to any public activity or of public interest or which would cause an unwarranted invasion of privacy of an individual. However, what constitutes an unwarranted invasion of privacy is not defined.

Right to Reputation

Right to reputation implies that any allegation casting an adverse reflection on the character of an individual should not be published, unless it comes under certain circumstances. If it is not under those circumstances, the media entity will be guilty of defamation. This also emanates from article 21 of the constitution.

Laws of contempt of court

The paramount considerations for the law of contempt of court include the dignity of the court and fairness of the trial. This implies that once a case has reached court, no one is allowed to publish his own version of the facts. A violation of this rule, which has evolved judicially, would amount to contempt of court. It is backed by various statutes and prohibits the publication/broadcast of certain matters under the court trial. One example is that the name of a rape victim cannot be published without permission of the court.

Current Affairs on Media Trial

Former Chief Justice of India R M Lodha described the issue as “very serious” and said the court would consider some guidelines to be put in place for balancing the rights and interests of all the stakeholders.

  • The Supreme Court needs to delve into the issue in the wake of growing instances of trials by media and public condemnation of accused on the basis of information provided by police and prosecutors although the trial remains to conclude.
  • Court has taken a serious note on a media briefing by police and other investigating agencies.
  • Nothing should be done to hamper investigations and secrecy of the probe.
  • This all needs certain checks because they all touch upon Article 21.
  • A parallel process of trial by media should not be allowed when a trial is already going on in court.

The Supreme Court is now expected to consider framing guidelines for media over covering criminal cases and briefing by investigating agencies.